Can a relatively large spinal cord for the dural sac influence severity of paralysis in elderly patients with cervical spinal cord injury caused by minor trauma?

Retrospective reviewThe degree of spinal cord compression and bony spinal canal stenosis are risk factors for the occurrence of spinal cord injury (SCI) without major fracture or dislocation, but they do not affect the severity of neurological symptoms. However, whether a relatively large spinal cord for the dural sac influences the severity of symptoms in SCI cases is unknown.The purpose of this study was to verify the influence of spinal cord size relative to dural sac on the severity of paralysis in elderly patients with cervical SCI caused by minor trauma.Subjects were 50 elderly patients with SCI caused by falls on flat ground. At 72 hours after injury, neurological assessment was performed using the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) scoring system. Bony canal anteroposterior diameters (APD) at mid C5 vertebral body were measured with computed tomography. We measured dural sac and spinal cord APD at the injured level and mid C5 with magnetic resonance imaging. Spinal cord compression ratio was calculated by dividing spinal cord at the injured level by spinal cord at mid C5. As the evaluation of spinal cord size relative to the dural sac, spinal cord/dural sac ratio was calculated at the injured level and mid C5. To clarify the factors influencing the severity of paralysis, the relationships between JOA score and those parameters were examined statistically.A significant negative correlation was observed between JOA score and spinal cord/dural sac ratio at mid C5. No clear relationship was observed between JOA score and bony canal APD or spinal cord compression ratio.In elderly patients with SCI caused by minor trauma, a relatively large spinal cord for the dural sac was shown to be a factor that influences the severity of paralysis. This result can be useful for the treatment and prevention of SCI in the elderly.

Clinical Outcome of Muscle-Preserving Interlaminar Decompression (MILD) for Lumbar Spinal Canal Stenosis: Minimum 5-Year Follow-Up Study.

INTRODUCTION: Favorable short-term outcomes have been reported following muscle-preserving interlaminar decompression (MILD), a less invasive decompression surgery for lumbar spinal canal stenosis (LSCS). However, there are no reports of mid- to long-term outcomes. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical outcomes five or more years after treatment of LSCS with MILD. METHODS: Subjects were 84 cases with LSCS (44 males; mean age, 68.7 years) examined five or more years after MILD. All patients had leg pain symptoms, with claudication and/or radicular pain. The patients were divided into three groups depending on the spinal deformity: 44 cases were without deformity (N group); 20 had degenerative spondylolisthesis (DS group); and 20 had degenerative scoliosis (DLS group). The clinical evaluation was performed using Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) scores, and revision surgeries were examined. Changes in lumbar alignment and stability were evaluated using plain radiographs. RESULTS: The overall JOA score recovery rate was 65.5% at final follow-up. The recovery rate was 69.5% in the N group, 65.2% in the DS group, and 54.0% in the DLS group, with the rate of the DLS group being significantly lower. There were 16 revision surgery cases (19.0%): seven in the N group (15.9%), three in the DS group (15.0%) and six in the DLS group (30.0%). There were no significant differences between pre- and postoperative total lumbar alignment or dynamic intervertebral angle in any of the groups, slip percentage in the DS group, or Cobb angle in the DLS group. CONCLUSIONS: The mid-term clinical results of MILD were satisfactory, including in cases with deformity, and there was no major impact on radiologic lumbar alignment or stability. The clinical outcomes of cases with degenerative scoliosis were significantly less favorable and the revision rate was high. This should be taken into consideration when deciding on the surgical procedure.

Posterior resection of fifth lumbar giant schwannoma combined with a recapping transiliac approach: case report and technical note.

A two-stage combined anterior and posterior approach is commonly used for total resection of giant spinal tumors. However, an anterior approach at the lower lumbar level is technically challenging because of the anatomy of the iliac wing, major vessels and nerves of the lumbosacral plexus. We report a case of fifth vertebral tumor treated posteriorly with a newly devised surgical procedure combined with a recapping transiliac approach. A 45-year-old female diagnosed with giant schwannoma of the fifth lumbar vertebra underwent single-stage posterior tumor resection combined with osteotomy of the lateral part of the iliac crest. Without an anterior approach, tumor excision was completed with a wide view into the fifth lumbar vertebral body. Autogenous bone graft was harvested and used to treat the bone defect. The resected iliac bone was recapped and fixed with screws. The patient was monitored for 8 years without recurrence, and postoperative lumbar alignment remained unchanged. This surgical procedure is safe and a useful adjunct approach for posterior total resection of giant spinal tumors at the lower lumbar level.

Magnetic Resonance Imaging Evaluation of the Effects of Surgical Invasiveness on Paravertebral Muscles After Muscle-preserving Interlaminar Decompression (MILD).

STUDY DESIGN: This is a retrospective study. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to determine the extent of damage to the paravertebral muscles after muscle-preserving interlaminar decompression (MILD) using magnetic resonance imaging to evaluate changes in the multifidus muscle (MF). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Short-term surgical outcomes of MILD for lumbar spinal canal stenosis (LSCS) are satisfactory; however, the extent of damage to the paravertebral muscles after MILD remains unclear. METHODS: Thirty-four patients (18 men/16 women; mean age: 72.6 y) who had LSCS treated with MILD were retrospectively investigated. A total of 61 decompressed disk levels [L2/3(5); L3/4(21); L4/5(30); L5/S(5)] and 34 nondecompressed levels (L1/2) were assessed. There was 1 decompressed disk level in 12 cases, 2 in 17 cases, and 3 in 5 cases. Magnetic resonance imaging scans were obtained before surgery and at 3 and 12-18 months after surgery, using the same scanner. The rate of paravertebral muscle atrophy was evaluated to compare the area of the MF in the T2-weighted axial plane (intervertebral disk level) preoperatively and postoperatively, using OsiriX Medical Imaging Software. Changes in muscle signal intensity were also recorded. Statistical analysis was performed using 3-way analysis of variance with the post hoc Fisher PSLD test. RESULTS: The rate of MF atrophy was 4.0% at the decompressed levels and 2.1% at the nondecompressed levels. There were no changes of signal intensity in the MF between the preoperative and postoperative periods. In decompressed levels, muscle atrophy and signal intensity were significantly improved from 3 months to 12-18 months after surgery. The number and level of the decompressed disks did not affect the extent of muscle injury. CONCLUSIONS: The extent of paravertebral muscle injury after MILD is satisfactory. The midline interlaminar approach used in this technique may prevent local denervation and irreversible damage to the paravertebral muscles. These results indicate that MILD is useful to treat LSCS less invasively.

The clinical usefulness of preoperative dynamic MRI to select decompression levels for cervical spondylotic myelopathy.

The study subjects included 54 patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy who underwent a selective laminoplasty. The patients were divided into three groups according to the number of decompressed levels: two levels, three levels and four or five levels. The number of cord compressions at every intervertebral level was determined in the flexion, neutral, and extension position using a dynamic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan in consideration of both static and dynamic compressions. For each group, the clinical outcomes were evaluated. Moreover, the patients were divided into two groups according to their age. Then, the appearance ratios of cord compression between the neutral and extension position were compared at each intervertebral level. The clinical outcomes were satisfactory. There were no statistical differences among the three groups, except for the age and operation time. The position of the neck influenced the number of cord compressions. The appearance ratios of cord compression, which were especially prominent at C2/3, C3/4 and C4/5, showed high scores in the aged. The preoperative dynamic MRI scan was clinically useful. In the aged, attention should be given to C2/3, C3/4 and C4/5.

Muscle-preserving interlaminar decompression for the lumbar spine: a minimally invasive new procedure for lumbar spinal canal stenosis.

STUDY DESIGN: Outcomes of muscle-preserving interlaminar decompression (MILD) for the lumbar spine are reported. OBJECTIVE: To verify the clinical findings of lumbar MILD. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: A preliminary short-term follow-up study of lumbar MILD demonstrated satisfactory neural recovery and reduced invasiveness. METHODS.: The initial 105 consecutive patients with lumbar spinal canal stenosis were included in this study. A total of 210 intervertebral levels were decompressed. There were 48 women and 57 men, and the mean patient age was 68.8 years. The postoperative follow-up period ranged from 8 to 44 months (mean 21.3 months). Eighty-one patients showed cauda equina claudication, and 75 patients complained of radicular pain. Preoperative imaging studies demonstrated that all patients had moderate-to-severe spinal canal stenosis, 75 patients had degenerative spinal canal stenosis, and the remaining 30 had degenerative spondylolisthesis. Pre- and postoperative Japanese Orthopedic Association scores, intraoperative blood loss, surgical complications, and postoperative ambulation were recorded. RESULTS.: One hundred five patients underwent lumbar MILD procedure for 210 interspinous levels, 42 patients for 2 levels, 37 patients for 1 level, 17 for 3 levels, 7 for 4 levels, and 2 for 5 levels. Cerebrospinal fluid leakage due to dural tear occurred in 2 patients. Expansion of the operative field was not necessary to repair the dura mater. The mean operation time was 104.9 minutes per level, and mean intraoperative blood loss was 29.4 g per level. Neurologic improvement was demonstrated in all patients. The mean recovery rate calculated with pre- and postoperative Japanese Orthopedic Association scores was 64.9%. Patients started to stand or walk an average of 2.5 days after surgery. None of the patients presented with wound infection. There was no neurologic complication in this series. CONCLUSION: In MILD for the lumbar spine, damage to the posterior stabilizing structures such as the intervertebral facet joints, paravertebral muscles, thoracolumbar fascia, supra- and interspinous ligaments, can be minimized, while preserving the function of the spinous processes as lever arms for lumbar extension.

Atlantoaxial subluxation in different intraoperative head positions in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

BACKGROUND: Disorders of the cervical spine are often observed in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). However, the best head position for RA patients with atlantoaxial subluxation in the perioperative period is unknown. This study investigated head position during general anesthesia for the patients with RA and proven atlantoaxial subluxation. METHODS: During anesthesia of patients with RA and proven atlantoaxial subluxation, the authors used fluoroscopy to obtain a lateral view of the upper cervical spine in four different positions: the mask position, the intubation position, the flat pillow position, and the protrusion position. Copies of the still fluoroscopic images were used to determine the anterior atlantodental interval, the posterior atlantodental interval, and the angle of atlas and axis (C1-C2 angle). RESULTS: The anterior atlantodental interval was significantly smaller in the protrusion position (2.3 mm) than in the flat pillow position (5.1 mm) (P < 0.05). The posterior atlantodental interval was significantly greater in the protrusion position (18.9 mm) than in the flat pillow position (16.2 mm) (P < 0.05). The C1-C2 angle was, on average, 9.3 degrees greater in the protrusion position than in the flat pillow position (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: This study showed that the protrusion position using a flat pillow and a donut-shaped pillow during general anesthesia reduced the anterior atlantodental interval and increased the posterior atlantodental interval in RA patients with atlantoaxial subluxation. This suggests that the protrusion position, which involves support of the upper cervical spine and extension at the craniocervical junction, might be advantageous for these patients.

Is posterior spinal cord shifting by extensive posterior decompression clinically significant for multisegmental cervical spondylotic myelopathy?

STUDY DESIGN: Posterior cervical spinal cord shifting after selective single laminectomy associated with partial laminotomies was compared with that after bilateral open-door laminoplasty between the C3 and C7 levels in relation to the clinical results of each procedure. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the clinical significance of posterior spinal cord shifting after extensive cervical laminoplasty. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Current techniques used for cervical laminoplasty for multisegmental cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) are consecutively performed between the C3 and C6 or C7 levels with expectation that the spinal cord will shift backward to keep it clear of anterior compression. However, the clinical significance of the posterior spinal cord shifting remains controversial, and there has been no report verifying it by comparing limited posterior decompression procedures with conventional extensive ones. METHODS: Twenty-six patients with consecutive 2- to 3-level CSM who underwent selective laminoplasty (Group A) were enrolled in the study, and among 56 CSM patients who underwent bilateral open-door laminoplasty between the C3 and C7 levels, 25 who had consecutive 2- or 3- level stenosis identified by preoperative magnetic resonance imaging were used as controls (Group B). The recovery rate was calculated using preoperative and postoperative Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) scores for each patient, and for each patient's magnetic resonance imaging, the postoperative cervical curvature index was obtained according to Ishihara's method and the magnitude of postoperative backward shifting of the spinal cord was measured. RESULTS: There was no significant difference between the subjects in Groups A and B with respect to the spinal curvature index, preoperative JOA scores, and recovery rate, but the magnitude of the postoperative posterior shifting of the spinal cord was greater for those in Group B than for those in Group A. There was no correlation between the recovery rate and posterior shifting of the spinal cord for each group, and no correlation was also found between the curvature index and posterior shifting of the spinal cord. CONCLUSIONS: The outcome of posterior decompression surgery for multisegmental CSM is not correlated with the magnitude of postoperative backward shifting of the spinal cord. Extensive and consecutive decompression performed in conventional cervical laminoplasties is therefore not always necessary for multisegmental CSM.